Participants Framework: An invite to sign up a survey researching relationships 
profiles is actually claimed because of the around three Dutch relationships other sites, demonstrating the research is accomplished by the latest University away from Groningen. You to definitely site claimed the web link toward paid survey within bi-weekly email publication delivered to participants, others a couple released brand new advertisement on their web log or site.
The web based questionnaire started that have telling participants regarding the volunteer and anonymous profile for the data carried out by the fresh new University off Groningen. These were expected to suggest their consent from the ticking a package and may even up coming move on to the newest questionnaire (maybe not ticking the package perform let them exit the newest questionnaire). Respondents was in fact up coming at random assigned to the new experimental vignettes. The fresh new relationships character was lead just like the following the: “We about Netherlands are interested in future toward experience of other american singles as a consequence of relationships other sites. How somebody present themselves within character may have a massive impact on the number of responses they get. Next, we’ll show you an excellent transcript out of a profile text message, versus a picture (due to privacy reasons). The individual about reputation is selected by computers: both of you reside in an equivalent area and therefore are throughout the exact same decades class.” A sex natural scenario are composed similar to profiles demonstrated to the relationship other sites. The fresh new dysfunction entailed works (teacher), appeal (golf and mountain bicycling), and you will identification services (social, natural, productive, comedy and sometimes persistent). This breakdown try the same towards several requirements. In the center of the new profile, the manipulation is actually exhibited. On the cancer character, it was mentioned “Since i complete means to fix cancers 2 years before, I’m pleased to be live and i benefit from the simple one thing in life way more: such as for example fun for supper, chuckling together, taking one glass of drink, however, I additionally delight in going on a secondary or short travels”. Regarding the suit reputation, that it area was “Since i have nearly forgotten my closest friend in a car freeze 24 months in the past, … [similar text message]”. Brand new Moral Committee of psychology agencies of the College or university off Groningen, the netherlands, accepted this study (ppo-015-082).
In total, 424 users participated, but 41 (10%) was omitted on account of technical errors and 59 (15%) was indeed excluded as they was basically in a committed dating. Which triggered a final take to regarding 324 respondents, at which 186 (44%) was indeed randomized so you’re able to rates proper character and you may 238 (56%) rated a disease character (discover Table step 1, column experiment step one). No class differences in age (F(step 1, 303) = 0.9, p = .340), intercourse (? 2 (1) = 0.39, p = .533) otherwise dating history (? dos (2) = 0.twenty four, p = .887) was in fact receive anywhere between respondents throughout the healthy versus. the fresh new cancers symptom in try step one. Of total shot, 92% had experience with malignant tumors within household members (i.elizabeth., a father (30%), grandparent (30%), cousin (11%), aunt/ bro (37%)), a friend (49%), and/otherwise an enchanting spouse (10.5%); note that respondents you are going to indicate multiple categories in the event that appropriate.
Very first group questions regarding sex, degree level, relationship condition (single, divorced, widowed, inside the a love), sexual positioning, and you can geographic region was questioned
Details tips: Shortly after training the new vignette, respondents conveyed to your a graphic analog level out of 0–10 (i.elizabeth. no-yes) if they do day this individual (we.e. matchmaking desire). Next, it conveyed toward an eleven-section Likert-kind of level (0 = not at all, 10 = greatly) how they ranked the newest fictive individual for the being sympathetic, fascinating, athletic, glamorous, healthy, amicable, and you may comedy. I report scores for each of them attributes independently.
Abilities.
Hypothesis 1 2: less interest in cancer survivors, especially for women and Hypothesis 3: less interest among divorced and widowed respondents: A univariate general linear model with interest in a date as dependent variable and condition (healthy vs. cancer), gender, and relationship status (divorced, never married, widowed) and the interaction terms as fixed factors (F(11, 312) = 3.2, p < .001, ? 2 = .102) showed a main effect for condition (F(1, 312) = 4.6; p = .033, ? 2 = .014, d = 0.11) and gender (F(1, 312) = 5.9, p = .015, ? 2 = .019, d = 0.44), but no main effect for relationship status (F(2, 312) = 0.5, p = .585, ? 2 = .003). Men and participants in the healthy condition were more interested in a date, yet the interaction between condition and gender was not significant (F(1,312) = 0.4, p = .515, ? 2 = .001). 1, p = .017, ? 2 = .026). Simple effects analysis showed that only widowed respondents had significantly lower interest in dating a cancer survivor than divorced singles (mean difference = 1.87, SE = 7.9, p = .024; d = 0.82), and never married singles (mean difference = 1.49, SE = 7.7, p = .054; d = 0.67). In the healthy condition, interest did not differ by relationship status (S1 Fig and Table 2).